|
Post by arfanho7 on Feb 22, 2024 3:13:53 GMT -5
How about if we looked at a unit and said how much better is the unit as a result of your presence How much worse is the unit when you’re not there I think every organizational form is a team dynamic and I think by and large we’re a lot like basketball. We pay you for your individual metrics and we thrive based on your team performance. I think we’re just at the dawn of figuring out how to do it. BK I may have to take that to the Dean. That’s great advice Professor Frei. Thank you for joining us. FF What a deep pleasure. Thank you. with thousands of others in the Harvard Business School case collection at HBR.org. I’m Brian Kenny. Thanks for listening to Cold Call the official podcast of Harvard Business School. CLOSEWhat’s the Value of a America Cell Phone Number List Win in College Athletics by Roberta Holland As debate continues over whether student athletes should be paid professor Doug Chung’s research on the massive money being earned by collegiate football and basketball programs could help guide the answer. As the debate continues over whether college student athletes should be paid for their on field performances a new study from Harvard Business School reveals just how much intercollegiate football and basketball programs contribute to a school’s bottom line. The quantitative link between game day and payday is courtesy of Assistant Professor Doug J. Chung who reviewed schools with Division I football and basketball teams matching athletic performance with revenue flow covering an year period.
|
|